This is the urban century. For the first time in human history the majority of people live in urban areas, which are growing proportionally faster than any other form of land cover. It is vital to understand the ecology of these areas for two main reasons. First, they are playing an increasing role in landscapes, both directly by supplanting other land covers, and indirectly as the ultimate source of most of the anthropogenic pressures being placed on the planet. Second, despite growing evidence of the importance of these interactions for health and well-being, people are becoming increasingly isolated from nature, and for many of them urban environments are the principal or only arena for such contact as they do have.
(i) Night-time lighting
The global and regional distribution of artificial night-time lights has frequently been used as an indicator of the urban transformation. However, more directly, such imagery also captures the spread of an evolutionarily unprecedented environmental change, the disruption across large areas of the Earth of the spatial and temporal (daily, seasonal, annual) patterns and cycles of light and dark that have previously remained approximately constant as a consequence of the Earth’s rotation, tilt of axis and orbital motion. This has raised ecological concerns, given that light and dark provide critical resources and environmental conditions for organisms and play key roles in their physiology, growth, behaviour and reproductive success, including providing cues used to entrain internal biological clocks to local time. Indeed, the potential has long been recognised that light pollution of the night may have profound consequences for the structure and functioning of populations, communities and ecosystems, and both science and policy documents regularly highlight this. Nonetheless, to date studies have focussed on obviously catastrophic effects on particular species, such as bird strikes on lighthouses and other tall lighted structures and the disorientation of hatchling sea turtles by beach-side lights. Empirical studies of the likely more pervasive and subtle effects on populations and communities remain wanting. We are working to bring about a step change in understanding of the population and community effects of night-time light pollution
(ii) Urban development
There is a growing appreciation of the benefits that can be obtained from urban areas, particularly from the green and blue infrastructure, rather than simply how to mitigate the negative influences of those areas. We are interested in quantifying the provision of biodiversity, ecosystem goods and services in urban areas, the spatial variation in this provision, and particularly how this provision can most effectively be improved.
[Key ref.: SECURE – SElf Conserving URban Environments www.secure-project.org; Measurement, Modelling, Mapping & Management (4M) www.4mfootprint.org; Urban River Corridors & Sustainable Living Agendas (URSULA) www.ursula.ac.uk; Barbosa, O., Tratalos, J.A., Armsworth, P.R., Davies, R.G., Fuller, R.A., Johnson, P. & Gaston, K.J. 2007. Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landscape Urban Plann. 83, 187-95; Fuller, R.A., Tratalos, J., Warren, P.H., Davies, R.G., Pępkowska, A. & Gaston, K.J. 2010. Environment and biodiversity. In: Dimensions of the sustainable city. Eds Jenks, M. & Jones, C. Springer Science, Dordrecht, pp. 75-103; Tratalos, J., Fuller, R.A., Warren, P.H., Davies, R.G. & Gaston, K.J. 2007. Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape Urban Plann. 83, 308-17]
(iii) Colonisation of urban areas
Alongside the extinctions induced by urbanisation, an increasing number of native species are colonising urban environments for the first time. We are interested in how such colonisation processes take place. In particular, we have been using the European blackbird Turdus merula as a model study system.
[Key ref.: Evans, K.L., Gaston, K.J., Frantz, A.C., Simeoni, M., Sharp, S.P., McGowan, A., Dawson, D.A., Walasz, K., Partecke, J., Burke, T. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2009. Independent colonization of multiple urban centres by a formerly forest bird specialist. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 2403-10; Evans, K.L., Hatchwell, B.J., Parnell, M. & Gaston, K.J. 2010. A conceptual framework for the colonisation of urban areas: the blackbird Turdus merula as a case study. Biol. Rev. 85, 643-67]
(iv) Human-wildlife interactions
We are interested in the benefits that people gain from contact with nature in urban environments, and particularly from biodiversity. There is ample evidence that green and blue infrastructure are good for multiple dimensions of health and well-being, the challenge is to unpick what components of that infrastructure are of greatest importance.
[Key ref.: Fuller, R.A., Irvine, K.N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. 2007. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 3, 390-4; Irvine, K.N., Fuller, R.A., Devine-Wright, P., Tratalos, J., Payne, S.R., Warren, P.H., Lomas, K.J. & Gaston, K.J. 2010. Ecological and psychological value of urban green space. In: Dimensions of the sustainable city. Eds Jenks, M. & Jones, C. Springer Science, Dordrecht, pp. 215-37]
(v) Domestic gardens
Domestic gardens comprise a high proportion of the green space of urban areas in many developed countries. We have conducted some of the most extensive and intensive studies of the importance of such gardens for biodiversity and ecosystem services.
[Key ref.: Biodiversity in Urban Gardens project www.bugs.group.shef.ac.uk; Davies, Z.G., Fuller, R.A., Loram, A., Irvine, K.N., Sims, V. & Gaston, K.J. 2009. A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biol. Conserv. 142, 761-71; Gaston, K.J., Smith, R.M., Thompson, K. & Warren, P.H. 2005. Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiv. Conserv. 14, 395-413; Gaston, K.J., Warren, P.H., Thompson, K. & Smith, R.M. 2005. Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodiv. Conserv. 14, 3327-49; Loram, A., Tratalos, J., Warren, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. 2007. Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent & structure of the resource in five cities. Landscape Ecol. 22, 601-15; Smith, R.M., Gaston, K.J., Warren, P.H. & Thompson, K. 2005. Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape. Landscape Ecol. 20, 235-53; Smith, R.M., Thompson, K., Hodgson, J.G., Warren, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. 2006. Urban domestic gardens (IX): Composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 129, 312-22; Smith, R.M., Thompson, K., Warren, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. 2010. Urban domestic gardens (XIII): composition of the bryophyte and lichen floras, and determinants of species richness. Biol. Conserv. 143, 873-82]