Tang, Z., Fang, J., Chi, X., Feng, J., Liu, Y., Shen, Z., Wang, X., Wang, Z., Wu, X., Zheng, C. & Gaston, K.J. 2012. Patterns of plant beta-diversity along elevational and latitudinal gradients in mountain forests of China. Ecography 35, 1083-1091.
Biodiversity patterns and their underlying mechanisms have long been focal topics of study for ecologists and biogeographers. However, compared with spatial variation in species richness (alpha- and gamma-diversity), beta-diversity, or the dissimilarity of species composition between two or more sites has until recently received limited attention. In this study, we explored the large-scale patterns of altitudinal turnover (beta-diversity) of plants in montane forests of China, based on systematic inventories of 1153 plots from 46 mountains distributed over ~30 degrees of latitude (21.9–51.7°N) and ~4100 m of altitude (160–4250 m). The beta-diversity of trees and shrubs declined significantly with increasing latitude. Along the altitudinal gradient, beta-diversity of both trees and shrubs showed non-significant trends in most mountains. Differences in climate explained ~30.0% of the variation in tree beta-diversity, with mean annual temperature being most important, and ~10.0% of that in shrub beta-diversity, with annual actual evapotranspiration and annual precipitation as the main predictors. However, climatic controls of beta-diversity varied dramatically in different biogeograpical regions. The beta-diversity of trees exhibited stronger, whereas that of shrubs showed weaker, climatic patterns in temperate and arid than subtropical regions. These results suggest that mechanisms causing patterns of beta-diversity may differ between latitudinal and altitudinal gradients, and among biogeographical regions; as a result, caution should be exercised in drawing close parallels between patterns and causes of beta-diversity along latitudinal and altitudinal gradients and among regions.






The densities and survival of many wild animals are presently at risk. Crucial for improving conservation actions is an understanding on a large scale of the relative importance of human and ecological factors in determining the distribution and densities of species. However, even for such charismatic species as the African elephant (Loxodonta africana), spatially explicit, large-scale analyses are lacking, although various local-scale studies are available. Here we show through continent-scale analysis that ecological factors, such as food availability, are correlated with the presence of elephants, but human factors are better predictors of elephant population densities where elephants are present. These densities strongly correlate with conservation policy, literacy rate, corruption and economic welfare, and associate less with the availability of food or water for these animals. Our results suggest that conservation strategies should be organized in a socioeconomic context. The successful conservation of large animal species could depend more on good human education, greater literacy, good governance, and less corruption, than merely setting aside areas for conservation.



